These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Search MEDLINE/PubMed
Title: Influence of finish line design on marginal adaptation of electroformed metal-ceramic crowns. Author: Shiratsuchi H, Komine F, Kakehashi Y, Matsumura H. Journal: J Prosthet Dent; 2006 Mar; 95(3):237-42. PubMed ID: 16543022. Abstract: STATEMENT OF PROBLEM: Gold electroformed metal-ceramic restorations have been promoted as alternatives to conventional metal-ceramic restorations. However, little is known about the relationship between tooth preparation design and marginal adaptation for this type of crown. PURPOSE: This study evaluated the influence of 3 different finish line designs on the marginal adaptation of electroformed metal copings and metal-ceramic crowns. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Three steel dies were prepared for maxillary central incisor crowns with 3 finish line designs: shoulder, rounded shoulder, and deep chamfer preparations. Eight standardized electroformed metal-ceramic crowns were fabricated for each group. Marginal discrepancies were measured at 60 points for each specimen along the circumferential margin at 4 sites (labial, mesial, lingual, and distal surfaces, with 15 points for each site) before and after firing procedures using a laser microscope. Data among the 3 different groups were statistically analyzed using the Kruskal-Wallis test and the Mann-Whitney U test with the Bonferroni correction. Marginal discrepancies between prefiring and postfiring procedures were evaluated using the Wilcoxon signed-ranks test (alpha = .05). RESULTS: Significant differences in the marginal discrepancies of electroformed metal copings without porcelain and metal-ceramic crowns were found among all groups. The lowest range of median marginal discrepancy values (P < .05) at 4 sites, both before and after firing, occurred with the deep chamfer preparation (17.64-21.78 microm and 23.96-25.72 microm, respectively). The highest range values were observed in the shoulder preparation (38.13-49.89 microm and 73.87-89.44 microm, respectively). In all situations, the marginal discrepancies of the postfiring procedures were significantly greater (P = .02 or less) than those of the prefiring procedures. CONCLUSION: Within the limitations of this study, the marginal adaptation of electroformed metal copings or metal-ceramic crowns is affected by finish line design and sequentially diminished by porcelain firing procedures.[Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]