These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Evaluation of dairy food processing wash water solids as a protein source: I. Forage intake, animal performance, ruminal fermentation, and site of digestion in heifers fed medium-quality hay.
    Author: Caton JS, Williams JE, May T, Beaver EE, Belyea RL.
    Journal: J Anim Sci; 1991 Aug; 69(8):3406-15. PubMed ID: 1654316.
    Abstract:
    Twelve ruminally, duodenally, and ileally cannulated (average initial BW 313 +/- 20 kg) and 27 intact Hereford heifers (average initial BW 256 +/- 17 kg) were used in two experiments to evaluate dairy food wash water solids (WWS) as a protein source in medium-quality hay diets. Heifers received a basal diet of orchardgrass hay (7.4% CP) and were assigned to one of three supplement treatments: control (C; .9% CP), WWS (18.8% CP)-, and soybean meal (SBM; 19.1% CP)-based supplements (fed at 1.5 kg of DM/d). Supplements were formulated to have similar ME concentrations. Ruminal ammonia concentrations were greater (P less than .10) for WWS- and SBM-supplemented heifers than for C heifers at most sampling times. Moreover, WWS and SBM increased (P less than .10) total VFA (mM) and acetate (mol/100 mol) and lowered propionate (mol/100 mol) at several sampling times. Ruminal fluid volume (liters) was unchanged (P greater than .10) by treatment; however, fluid dilution and flow rate (liters/h) were less (P less than .10) in C heifers than in heifers fed SBM or WWS supplements. Wash water solids and SBM supplementation increased (P less than .10) OM, NDF, and ADF digestibilities compared with C heifers. Feeding WWS and SBM supplements increased BW at 84 d (P less than .10) compared with C-supplemented heifers. Forage intake at 54 and 84 d by heifers supplemented with SBM or WWS was greater (P less than .10) than by C heifers. Control-supplemented heifers had the least, WWS intermediate, and SBM the greatest ADG at 84 d (P less than .10; .14 vs .35 vs .48 kg/d, respectively). These data indicate that WWS may be used as a protein source without serious adverse effects in heifers consuming medium-quality hay for 84 d.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]