These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Glutathionyl- and hydroxyl radical formation coupled to the redox transitions of 1,4-naphthoquinone bioreductive alkylating agents during glutathione two-electron reductive addition.
    Author: Goin J, Gibson DD, McCay PB, Cadenas E.
    Journal: Arch Biochem Biophys; 1991 Aug 01; 288(2):386-96. PubMed ID: 1654832.
    Abstract:
    The kinetic parameters of the redox transitions subsequent to the two-electron transfer implied in the glutathione (GSH) reductive addition to 2- and 6-hydroxymethyl-1,4-naphthoquinone bioalkylating agents were examined in terms of autoxidation, GSH consumption in the arylation reaction, oxidation of the thiol to glutathione disulfide (GSSG), and free radical formation detected by the spin-trapping electron spin resonance method. The position of the hydroxymethyl substituent in either the benzenoid or the quinonoid ring differentially influenced the initial rates of hydroquinone autoxidation as well as thiol oxidation. Thus, GSSG- and hydrogen peroxide formation during the GSH reductive addition to 6-hydroxymethyl-1,4-naphthoquinone proceeded at rates substantially higher than those observed with the 2-hydroxymethyl derivative. The distribution and concentration of molecular end products, however, was the same for both quinones, regardless of the position of the hydroxymethyl substituent. The [O2]consumed/[GSSG]formed ratio was above unity in both cases, thus indicating the occurrence of autoxidation reactions other than those involved during GSSG formation. EPR studies using the spin probe 5,5'-dimethyl-1-pyrroline-N-oxide (DMPO) suggested that the oxidation of GSH coupled to the above redox transitions involved the formation of radicals of differing structure, such as hydroxyl and thiyl radicals. These were identified as the corresponding DMPO adducts. The detection of either DMPO adduct depended on the concentration of GSH in the reaction mixture: the hydroxyl radical adduct of DMPO prevailed at low GSH concentrations, whereas the thiyl radical adduct of DMPO prevailed at high GSH concentrations. The production of the former adduct was sensitive to catalase, whereas that of the latter was sensitive to superoxide dismutase as well as to catalase. The relevance of free radical formation coupled to thiol oxidation is discussed in terms of the thermodynamic and kinetic properties of the reactions involved as well as in terms of potential implications in quinone cytotoxicity.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]