These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Detection of Mycobacterium avium & M. tuberculosis from human sputum cultures by PCR-RFLP analysis of hsp65 gene & pncA PCR.
    Author: Bannalikar AS, Verma R.
    Journal: Indian J Med Res; 2006 Feb; 123(2):165-72. PubMed ID: 16575116.
    Abstract:
    BACKGROUND & OBJECTIVE: Identification of mycobacteria by conventional methods is slow, labour intensive and may at times fail to produce precise results. Molecular techniques developed in the recent past, overcome these disadvantages facilitating rapid identification of most species. We undertook this study to characterize mycobacteria isolated from sputa of human patients suspected to have tuberculosis by conventional methods and later, by polymerase chain reaction-restriction fragment length polymorphism analysis (PRA) of hsp65 gene and pncA PCR. METHODS: Twenty two mycobacteria isolated from 30 sputum samples were identified based on growth rate, pigmentation, cultural and biochemical properties and subjected to PRA of hsp65 gene involving amplification of hsp65 gene and digestion of the product with BstEII and HaeIII in separate reactions and analysis of digests by 3 per cent agarose gel electrophoresis. The mycobacteria were simultaneously evaluated by M. tuberculosis-specific and M. bovis-specific pncA PCR assays in separate reactions. RESULTS: With the conventional biochemical tests, the 22 sputum culture isolates were identified as M. tuberculosis (19) and M. avium complex (MAC) (3). PCR of hsp65 gene yielded 439 bp product in all the mycobacteria tested. The RFLP patterns of three MAC isolates with BstEII and HaeIII were identical to reference M. avium strain with two fragments in each of the digest. M. intracellulare reference strain showed a distinct pattern with 3 fragments each in both enzyme digests. The PRA of hsp65 confirmed MAC isolates as M. avium. M. tuberculosis isolates including H37Rv and M. bovis strains could not be discriminated by PRA of hsp65. The two pncA PCR assays (M. bovis-specific and M. tuberculosis-specific) detected specifically the respective organisms with an amplification product of 185 bp. The MAC strains yielded no amplification product in both the pncA PCR assays. INTERPRETATION & CONCLUSION: PRA profiles of hsp65 could differentiate MAC isolates into M. avium and M. intracellulare but could not distinguish between M. tuberculosis and M. bovis. pncA PCR assays were found specific in detecting the respective mycobacterial species. The study confirms utility of pncA PCR assays in differential identification of M. tuberculosis and M. bovis and that of PRA of hsp65 in the identification of M. avium.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]