These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Ambient dose equivalent and effective dose from scattered x-ray spectra in mammography for Mo/Mo, Mo/Rh and W/Rh anode/filter combinations.
    Author: Künzel R, Herdade SB, Costa PR, Terini RA, Levenhagen RS.
    Journal: Phys Med Biol; 2006 Apr 21; 51(8):2077-91. PubMed ID: 16585846.
    Abstract:
    In this study, scattered x-ray distributions were produced by irradiating a tissue equivalent phantom under clinical mammographic conditions by using Mo/Mo, Mo/Rh and W/Rh anode/filter combinations, for 25 and 30 kV tube voltages. Energy spectra of the scattered x-rays have been measured with a Cd(0.9)Zn(0.1)Te (CZT) detector for scattering angles between 30 degrees and 165 degrees . Measurement and correction processes have been evaluated through the comparison between the values of the half-value layer (HVL) and air kerma calculated from the corrected spectra and measured with an ionization chamber in a nonclinical x-ray system with a W/Mo anode/filter combination. The shape of the corrected x-ray spectra measured in the nonclinical system was also compared with those calculated using semi-empirical models published in the literature. Scattered x-ray spectra measured in the clinical x-ray system have been characterized through the calculation of HVL and mean photon energy. Values of the air kerma, ambient dose equivalent and effective dose have been evaluated through the corrected x-ray spectra. Mean conversion coefficients relating the air kerma to the ambient dose equivalent and to the effective dose from the scattered beams for Mo/Mo, Mo/Rh and W/Rh anode/filter combinations were also evaluated. Results show that for the scattered radiation beams the ambient dose equivalent provides an overestimate of the effective dose by a factor of about 5 in the mammography energy range. These results can be used in the control of the dose limits around a clinical unit and in the calculation of more realistic protective shielding barriers in mammography.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]