These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Fracture strength of teeth restored with all-ceramic posts and cores.
    Author: Friedel W, Kern M.
    Journal: Quintessence Int; 2006 Apr; 37(4):289-95. PubMed ID: 16594360.
    Abstract:
    OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this in vitro investigation was to evaluate the fracture strength of endodontically treated teeth restored with different all-ceramic posts and cores. METHOD AND MATERIALS: Seventy-two endodontically treated human maxillary central incisors were divided into 3 groups with 24 teeth each and restored with 1 of the following methods: prefabricated zirconia ceramic posts and resin composite buildups; zirconia ceramic posts and copy-milled alumina ceramic cores (2-piece technique), or copy-milled all-ceramic posts and cores made from a zirconia-reinforced glass-infiltrated alumina ceramic (1-piece technique). Each group was divided into 3 subgroups of 8 samples each, consisting of teeth that did not receive crown restorations and were stored for 60 days, teeth restored with all-ceramic crowns and stored for 60 days, and teeth restored with all-ceramic crowns and subjected to 1.2 million loading cycles with 30 N in a chewing simulator. RESULTS: The mean fracture strengths ranged from 205 to 522 N. Prefabricated zirconia posts and resin composite buildups showed a statistically significantly lower fracture strength after chewing simulation than teeth restored with prefabricated zirconia posts and alumina ceramic cores. CONCLUSION: All-ceramic posts and cores made with the 2-piece technique showed promising fracture strengths under the tested conditions.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]