These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Combination analysis of hypermethylated Wnt-antagonist family genes as a novel epigenetic biomarker panel for bladder cancer detection.
    Author: Urakami S, Shiina H, Enokida H, Kawakami T, Kawamoto K, Hirata H, Tanaka Y, Kikuno N, Nakagawa M, Igawa M, Dahiya R.
    Journal: Clin Cancer Res; 2006 Apr 01; 12(7 Pt 1):2109-16. PubMed ID: 16609023.
    Abstract:
    PURPOSE: Aberrant promoter hypermethylation of Wnt-antagonist genes contributes to the pathogenesis of several cancers. We hypothesized that combined methylation analysis of Wnt-antagonist genes could improve their use as a panel of biomarkers for diagnosing and staging of bladder cancers. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Samples (54 total) of bladder tumor and corresponding normal bladder mucosa were analyzed for the methylation and expression levels of six Wnt-antagonist genes (sFRP-1, sFRP-2, sFRP-4, and sFRP-5, Wif-1, and Dkk-3). To increase the sensitivity/specificity of bladder tumor detection, the methylation score (M score), a new method for multigene methylation analysis, was developed. The M score of each sample was calculated as the sum of the corresponding log hazard ratio coefficients derived from multivariate logistic regression analysis of the methylation status for each Wnt-antagonist gene. Receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was used to determine the optimal sensitivity/specificity of the M score. Urine DNA from 24 matched patients with bladder tumor and 20 cancer-free volunteers was also used to investigate the methylation status of Wnt-antagonist genes. RESULTS: The methylation levels of Wnt-antagonists were significantly higher and mRNA levels were significantly lower in bladder tumor than in bladder mucosa. Each methylation level was inversely correlated with the corresponding mRNA level. In multivariate regression analysis, the methylation levels of sFRP-2 and Dkk-3 were significant independent predictors of bladder tumor (P < 0.05 and P < 0.01, respectively), whereas with sFRP-1, sFRP-5, and Wif-1 there was a trend towards significance as independent predictors. The M score of Wnt-antagonist genes was significantly higher in bladder tumor than in bladder mucosa (P < 0.05). Overall, the M score had a sensitivity of 77.2% and a specificity of 66.7% as a diagnostic biomarker (areas under the curve, 0.763). The M score could distinguish superficial from invasive bladder tumors with a sensitivity of 72.2% and a specificity of 61.1% as a staging biomarker (areas under the curve, 0.671). In patients with bladder tumor, 80.6% of the methylation-specific PCR results had identical methylation in samples of tumor- and urine-derived DNA. Most urine DNA in normal controls showed no aberrant methylation of the Wnt-antagonist genes. CONCLUSIONS: Hypermethylation of Wnt-antagonist genes plays an important role in the pathogenesis of bladder tumor and can be detected using cellular DNA extracted from urine samples. This is the first report demonstrating that M score analysis of Wnt-antagonist genes could serve as an excellent epigenetic biomarker panel for bladder tumors.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]