These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: [Whole-heart coronary MR angiography -- initial results].
    Author: Ozgun M, Hoffmeier A, Quante M, Fischbach R, Heindel W, Botnar R, Maintz D.
    Journal: Rofo; 2006 May; 178(5):500-7. PubMed ID: 16612789.
    Abstract:
    PURPOSE: To evaluate a new coronary MR angiography technique covering the whole coronary artery tree in one data set acquisition. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Six healthy volunteers and 15 patients with known CAD were examined with a navigator gated and corrected (NAV) free-breathing 3D steady-state free precession sequence covering the whole heart (WH-MRA) (TR = 5.4, TE = 2.7, SENSE factor = 2, 160 slices, 0.75 mm reconstructed slice thickness, in-plane resolution = 0.99 x 0.99 mm(2), scan time 14 min [50 % NAV efficiency]) and a vessel targeted 3D SSFP MRA sequence (t-MRA) (TR = 5.6 ms, TE = 2.8 ms, 20 slices of 1.5 mm reconstructed slice thickness, in-plane resolution = 0.99 x 0.99 mm(2), scan time = 7 min [50 % NAV efficiency]). Subjective image quality (4-point scale) and objective image quality parameters including vessel sharpness, vessel diameter and CNR were calculated for WH-MRA and t-MRA. In patients, the accuracy for detection of stenosis larger than 50 % was compared to the accuracy of X-ray coronary angiography (XA), which was considered the standard. RESULTS: WH-MRA demonstrated good vessel visibility in healthy subjects (100 %) whereas vessel visibility in patients was limited (78 % in an 8 segment evaluation). Vessel sharpness was inferior to that of t-MRA in patients (37 vs. 42 %) but equal in healthy subjects (42 %). Vessel diameter did not differ significantly between WH-MRA and t-MRA. CNR was significantly reduced for WH-MRA (CNR 7.4 vs. 11.5). The diagnostic accuracy for the detection of CAD was comparable for both MRA approaches (85.5 vs. 86.2 %). CONCLUSION: WH-MRA allows good coronary artery visualization in healthy subjects and patients and provides a simplified scanning procedure and advantages in 3D post-processing. Regarding image parameters and the detection of CAD, the results are comparable to those acquired with t-MRA. The major disadvantage remains the high number of diagnostically insufficient images.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]