These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: The evolution of the neocortex in mammals: intrinsic and extrinsic contributions to the cortical phenotype.
    Author: Karlen SJ, Krubitzer L.
    Journal: Novartis Found Symp; 2006; 270():146-59; discussion 159-69. PubMed ID: 16649713.
    Abstract:
    The neocortex is that portion of the brain that is involved in volitional motor control, perception, cognition and a number of other complex behaviours exhibited by mammals, including humans. Indeed, the increase in the size of the cortical sheet and cortical field number is one of the hallmarks of human brain evolution. Fossil records and comparative studies of the neocortex indicate that early mammalian neocortices were composed of only a few parts or cortical fields, and that in some lineages such as primates, the neocortex expanded dramatically. More significantly, the number of cortical fields increased and the connectivity between cortical fields became more complex. While we do not know the exact transformation between this type of increase in cortical field number and connectivity; and the emergence of complex behaviours like those mentioned above, we know that species that have large neocorticies with multiple parts generally have more complex behaviours, both overt and covert. Although a number of inroads have been made into understanding how neurons in the neocortex respond to a variety of stimuli, the micro and macro circuitry of particular neocortical fields, and the molecular developmental events that construct current organization, very little is known about how more cortical fields are added in evolution. In particular, we do not know the rules of change, nor the constraints imposed on evolving nervous systems that dictate the particular phenotype that will ultimately emerge. One reason why these issues are unresolved is that the brain is a compromise between existing genetic constraints and the need to adapt. Thus, the functions that the brain generates are absolutely imperfect, although functionally optimized. This makes it very difficult to determine the rules of construction, to generate viable computational models of brain evolution, and to predict the direction of changes that may occur over time. Despite these obstacles, it is still possible to study the evolution of the neocortex. One way is to study the products of the evolutionary process--extant mammal brains-and to make inferences about the process. The second way to study brain evolution is to examine the developmental mechanisms that give rise to complex brains. We have begun to test our theories regarding cortical evolution, generated from comparative studies, by 'tweaking' in a developing nervous system what we believe is naturally being modified in evolution. Our goals are to identify the constraints imposed on the evolving neocortex, to disentangle the genetic and activity dependent mechanisms that give rise to complex brains, and ultimately to produce a cortical phenotype that is consistent with what would naturally occur in evolution.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]