These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Application of periodontal tissue engineering using enamel matrix derivative and a human fibroblast-derived dermal substitute to stimulate periodontal wound healing in Class III furcation defects.
    Author: Hovey LR, Jones AA, McGuire M, Mellonig JT, Schoolfield J, Cochran DL.
    Journal: J Periodontol; 2006 May; 77(5):790-9. PubMed ID: 16671870.
    Abstract:
    BACKGROUND: Enamel matrix derivative (EMD) has been shown to promote several aspects of periodontal regeneration in vitro and in vivo. Recently, a bioengineered tissue (DG) was developed to promote wound healing of chronic skin ulcers. This pilot study sought to assess the effects of EMD and DG, alone or in combination, on periodontal wound healing in surgically created Class III furcation defects. METHODS: Six female baboons received bilateral ostectomy of approximately 10 mm around the first and second mandibular molars to achieve Class III, subclass C furcation defects. Wire ligatures and cotton pellets were left in place for 2 months to maintain the depth of the defects and promote plaque accumulation. Each furcally involved molar was then assigned to one of four treatments: open flap debridement (OFD), OFD plus EMD, OFD plus DG, or OFD plus DG and EMD. This resulted in six total sites per treatment group. Seven months after defect creation and 5 months after treatment, and after no oral hygiene, tissue blocks of the mandible were taken for blinded histometric analysis to assess parameters of periodontal regeneration adjacent to furcal root surfaces and from the mid-furcal aspect (i.e., new bone, new connective tissue attachment, new epithelial attachment, and new cementum formation). RESULTS: Histometric analysis demonstrated differential regenerative responses with respect to treatment within each animal. However, statistically significant differences between treatments from all six animals were not observed (P >0.20, mixed-model analysis of variance). EMD-treated sites presented mildly positive regenerative results and no negative responses. Both DG only and combination therapy demonstrated similar or less than positive responses relative to OFD controls. CONCLUSION: The descriptive analysis may suggest a positive effect of enamel matrix proteins and a negative effect of DG used alone or in combination with enamel matrix proteins on the regeneration of Class III furcation defects in baboons.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]