These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Search MEDLINE/PubMed
Title: [Continuous intravenous infusion versus intermittent administration of streptokinase in patients with deep venous thrombosis of the lower extremity]. Author: Lopaciuk S, Meissner AJ, Ziemski JM, Tokarz A, Psuja P, Zawilska K, Głowiński S, Wołczyński Z, Czestochowska E, Tymiński W. Journal: Pol Tyg Lek; ; 46(37-39):704-7. PubMed ID: 1669137. Abstract: In a multicenter randomized trial, the efficacy and safety of two streptokinase (SK) dosage regimens have been evaluated in patients with proximal deep vein thrombosis of inferior limbs. Twenty-nine patients received SK by a continuous intravenous infusion (250,000 IU as initial dose, 100,000 IU/h as maintenance dose), and 26 patients were treated with intermittent SK administration (500,000 IU as initial dose, followed by 250,000 IU every 12 h). Thrombolytic therapy was continued for 4 days, then the patients received heparin for 5 days and oral anticoagulant for 3 months. The results of treatment as judged by phlebographic examinations were similar in the two groups. Complete, substantial or partial thrombolysis was achieved in 52% of patients in the continuous infusion group and in 58% of patients in the intermittent treatment group. During SK administration, major bleeding complications occurred in 6 patients treated by continuous infusion and in 2 of the second group. The results showed that the intermittent SK administration is as effective and safe as the method of continuous SK infusion in the treatment of deep vein thrombosis.[Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]