These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Association between transferrin receptor-ferritin index and conventional measures of iron responsiveness in hemodialysis patients.
    Author: Chen YC, Hung SC, Tarng DC.
    Journal: Am J Kidney Dis; 2006 Jun; 47(6):1036-44. PubMed ID: 16731299.
    Abstract:
    BACKGROUND: The diagnostic power of the transferrin receptor-ferritin (TfR-F) index for identification of iron responsiveness in long-term hemodialysis (HD) patients compared with the routine markers recommended by the current US and European guidelines was appraised. METHODS: Initially, 121 long-term HD patients with a serum ferritin level less than 800 microg/L and on recombinant erythropoietin (rHuEPO) therapy for longer than 6 months were enrolled for intravenous iron (IVFE) supplementation (100 mg of iron polymaltose 3 times/wk for 4 weeks, then 100 mg every 2 weeks for 5 months). Routine iron tests (ie, serum ferritin and transferrin saturation [TSAT]), TfR-F index calculated by the ratio of soluble TfR to log ferritin level, hematocrit, hemoglobin, red blood cell count, and serum high-sensitive C-reactive protein were examined at baseline. Hematocrit and hemoglobin were followed up every 2 weeks during the study period. RESULTS: One hundred patients (52 men, 48 women; mean age, 59 years) completed this study. Fifty-two patients were IVFE responders, defined as an increase in hematocrit greater than 3% and/or a decrease in rHuEPO dose greater than 30% of baseline values at the end of the study, and 48 nonresponders did not fulfill these criteria. Of 52 responders, only 14 patients (27%) could be recognized for iron deficiency by means of routine iron tests (ferritin < 100 microg/L and/or TSAT < 20%). Thirty-three responders (63%) could be further identified for iron deficiency by using TfR-F index (> 0.6), but 5 (10%) still could not by either method. Analyses by using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves showed that a cutoff value greater than 0.6 for TfR-F index had greater sensitivity (90%) for the detection of iron deficiency than ferritin level less than 100 microg/L (29%) and TSAT less than 20% (6%). TfR-F index showed a greater area under the ROC curve than ferritin level (P < 0.05) and TSAT (P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: TfR-F index is superior to routine tests for predicting response to IVFE supplementation in long-term HD patients. Our study indicates that TfR-F index is a new and surrogate marker to estimate body iron stores and guide IVFE therapy for long-term HD patients.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]