These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Comparative study of the effect of tube drainage versus methylprednisolone after third molar surgery.
    Author: Ordulu M, Aktas I, Yalcin S, Azak AN, Evlioğlu G, Disçi R, Emes Y.
    Journal: Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2006 Jun; 101(6):e96-100. PubMed ID: 16731382.
    Abstract:
    OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to compare the effects of tube drainage versus a single dose of methylprednisolone (MP) on maximal mouth opening, facial swelling, and pain after third molar surgery. STUDY DESIGN: Twenty-two patients requiring extraction of bilaterally impacted mandibular third molars were selected. Each patient had 2 operations. In the first operation, a drainage tube was inserted into the buccal fold after the suture procedure and left there for 3 days. In the second operation 1 month after the first surgery, 1.5 mg/kg intravenous methylprednisolone was administered 1 hour before the surgery. The patients were evaluated by the same person for maximal mouth opening, facial swelling, and pain in the immediate preoperative time point and on the second, fifth, and seventh days after surgery. RESULTS: There was a statistically significant difference in mouth opening on fifth and seventh days but none in facial swelling and pain between MP group and drain group. CONCLUSION: We conclude that the use of a drain or methylprednisolone is useful in reducing postoperative discomfort after third molar surgery.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]