These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Search MEDLINE/PubMed
Title: Reliability of repeated sprint exercise in non-motorised treadmill ergometry. Author: Hughes MG, Doherty M, Tong RJ, Reilly T, Cable NT. Journal: Int J Sports Med; 2006 Nov; 27(11):900-4. PubMed ID: 16739088. Abstract: Although repeated sprint tests are relatively common, there have been few investigations of repeated sprint exercise using non-motorised treadmill ergometry. The purpose of this study was to determine the reliability of a repeated sprint procedure using this apparatus. Ten healthy, active males, performed three repeated sprint tests (six repetitions of 6 s sprints with 30 s recovery) on three separate occasions. Performance as determined by maximal speed, average force production, and fatigue were compared across the three trials. Maximal speed and average force were not significantly different between visits (p < 0.05) and a variety of reliability measures suggested good agreement (e.g., coefficient of variations no more than 5 %). The fatigue indices for maximal speed and for average force were generally less reliable (coefficients of variation around 30 % in both cases). In conclusion, measures of performance (maximal speed and average force) can provide reliable results in a repeated sprint protocol but the reliability of fatigue measures appears to be low.[Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]