These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Evaluation of sham non-invasive ventilation for randomized, controlled trials in ALS.
    Author: Gruis KL, Brown DL, Weatherwax KJ, Feldman EL, Chervin RD.
    Journal: Amyotroph Lateral Scler; 2006 Jun; 7(2):96-9. PubMed ID: 16753973.
    Abstract:
    Non-invasive positive pressure ventilation (NIV) treatment of advanced respiratory insufficiency prolongs survival in ALS. To investigate the critical question of whether earlier initiation of NIV might provide additional benefit, a randomized trial with an appropriate placebo is needed. This study evaluated sub-therapeutic (sham) continuous positive airway pressure as a potential placebo. In a single-blind design, 40 ALS patients with forced vital capacity>50% were randomized to receive 30 seconds (s) of either active NIV, with 8 cm H2O inspiratory and 4 cm H2O expiratory pressure, or sham NIV with<1 cm of H2O continuous positive airway pressure at the mask. A questionnaire was then used to assess whether subjects thought that they had received a "real" or "pretend" treatment trial. The subjects' median age was 60.5 years, and 38% were female. Twelve of 20 subjects (60%) who received active NIV and 7 (35%) of the 20 subjects who received sham thought that they had tried the active treatment (p = 0.11). Only 8 (20%) of all subjects were confident about their determination that they had received "real" or "pretend" NIV. Thus, sub-therapeutic (sham) continuous positive airway pressure is a promising placebo control for NIV trials in ALS.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]