These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: [Interventions in the rehabilitation of breast cancer patients--a critical literature review of the state of the art].
    Author: Weis J, Domann U.
    Journal: Rehabilitation (Stuttg); 2006 Jun; 45(3):129-45. PubMed ID: 16755432.
    Abstract:
    On account of the "rehabilitation sciences" research funding programme of the German federal research ministry and the statutory German Pension Insurance scheme, as well as an extensive Pension Insurance quality assurance programme, major scientific progress has been achieved in rehabilitation in terms of structures, processes and outcomes. Continuing the systematic assessment and evaluation of the increasing knowledge available, the German Pension Insurance scheme has introduced a comprehensive practice guidelines programme for the development of process guidelines in rehabilitation. In the framework of this sponsored programme and exemplary for the field of cancer rehabilitation, practice guidelines are also being developed for the rehabilitation of breast cancer patients. This article summarises the results of the first phase of this project, which had included a systematic literature analysis of the interventions in the rehabilitation of breast cancer patients, an analysis aimed at verifying whether these interventions had been evidence-based as well as at deriving specific recommendations for treatment in the framework of in-patient rehabilitation. The existing national and international guidelines for the treatment of breast cancer were analysed for this purpose, and a systematic search of the established literature databases (Medline, Psyndex, PsycINFO, CINAHL, DIMDI and EBMR) was carried out. Both ambulatory and in-patient interventions were included, whereas diagnostic, medical and nursing procedures as well as drug trials were excluded from the analysis. In all, some 200 articles have eventually been extracted for systematic analysis from a total of 480,317 articles. The articles were analysed and evaluated according to the Oxford Level of Evidence. Various interventions for breast cancer patients could be validated as treatment modules by this literature analysis, such as: relaxation techniques, physiotherapy, sport therapy, massage, lymph drainage, psycho-social counselling and therapies as well as artistic therapies. There are considerable differences among the modules with respect to their various levels of evidence. Whereas good levels of evidence could be found for relaxation techniques, sport therapy and psycho-social counselling and therapy, only a low level of evidence was found for lymph drainage and artistic therapies. In summary, it can be stated that different levels of evidence are applicable concerning the various interventions available in the rehabilitation of breast cancer patients. The next step ahead toward development of treatment guidelines will involve systematic consultations with experts in this field.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]