These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Search MEDLINE/PubMed
Title: [System thrombolytic therapy in acute myocardial infarction in the elderly]. Author: Repin AN, Syrkina AG, Markov VA. Journal: Klin Med (Mosk); 2006; 84(3):39-43. PubMed ID: 16758921. Abstract: The paper presents a retrospective cohort study of the records of 430 patients with myocardial infarction aged 60 to 91. Group I (main group) consisted of 234 patients who received system thrombolytic therapy (TLT); group II (controls) consisted of 196 patients who received conventional therapy. Hospital and long-term lethality, the course of the disease, and the complications of thrombolysis were evaluated. The study found no effect of TLT itself on the end points; there were differences between subgroups with effective and non-effective thrombolysis. Thus, comparison of these variables in patients aged 60 to 74 showed a decrease in the hospital lethality in the main group: 6.6% vs. 20.6% in the control group (p = 0.00072), and an increase in five-year survival (p = 0.0057). Cardiac arrhythmias (CA) and chronic heart failure were much less frequent in group I. Transient hypotension occurred in 36% of patients on thrombolytic therapy; reperfusion-related CA were noted in 25% of patients receiving thrombolysis. There were no cases of serious hemorrhage or cerebral strokes. None of the complications resulted in a lethal outcome. The study demonstrates that TLT is not contra-indicated in the elderly with myocardial infarction; complications are, as a rule, insignificant and easily reversible. When reperfusion is successful, thrombolysis lowers early and long-term lethality and improves the course of the disease in this very complex category of patients.[Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]