These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Search MEDLINE/PubMed
Title: Comparison of vitrification and conventional cryopreservation of day 5 and day 6 blastocysts during clinical application. Author: Liebermann J, Tucker MJ. Journal: Fertil Steril; 2006 Jul; 86(1):20-6. PubMed ID: 16762345. Abstract: OBJECTIVE: To evaluate implantation of day 5 and day 6 vitrified and slow-frozen blastocysts. DESIGN: Retrospective analysis comparing two cryopreservation techniques. SETTING: Private IVF clinic. PATIENT(S): Five hundred eight cryopreserved embryo transfer candidates. INTERVENTION(S): Supernumerary day 5 and day 6 blastocysts were vitrified or slow-frozen and transfered after warming or thawing. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Comparison of two cryopreservation techniques with respect to survival rate, implantation, and pregnancy rates of day 5 and day 6 blastocysts. RESULT(S): In 254 vitrified transfer cycles, survival, embryonic implantation, and clinical pregnancy rates for day 5 blastocysts were 95.9%, 33.4%, 48.7%, respectively, and for day 6 blastocysts 97.5%, 25.9%, 42.8%. In 254 slow-frozen transfer cycles, survival, embryonic implantation, and clinical pregnancy rates for day 5 blastocysts were 91.4%, 29.6%, 42.8%, respectively, and for day 6 blastocysts 94.8%, 28.2%, 43.1%. Overall there was a slightly, but not significantly, higher outcome regarding implantation and clinical pregnancy with the use of day 5 blastocysts (31.3% and 45.4%, respectively) versus day 6 blastocysts (26.7, and 42.9%, respectively). CONCLUSION(S): Vitrification technique yields the same implantation and pregnancy rate as slow-frozen blastocyst transfers. Slow growing embryos can be cryopreserved on day 6, because they yield a satisfactory survival, implantation, and pregnancy rate.[Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]