These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Wave microcarrier cultivation of MDCK cells for influenza virus production in serum containing and serum-free media.
    Author: Genzel Y, Olmer RM, Schäfer B, Reichl U.
    Journal: Vaccine; 2006 Aug 28; 24(35-36):6074-87. PubMed ID: 16781022.
    Abstract:
    A process for equine influenza virus vaccine production using a microcarrier system (Cytodex 1) in a 2 L Wave bioreactor is described. Growth of Madin Darby canine kidney (MDCK) cells in serum containing GMEM medium (SC) is compared to growth in serum-free Ex-Cell MDCK medium (SF) without washing steps and medium exchange before infection. Cultivations with microcarrier concentrations of 2 and 4 g/L for both media are shown. Metabolic data from carbon and amino acid metabolism are discussed. Additionally, in roller bottle experiments the influence of multiplicity of infection (moi) and trypsin concentration on the HA value was investigated. Analysis of HA and TCID(50) at 37 degrees C showed a stable HA of maximum 2.6 log HA/100 microL for 2 weeks. Peak TCID(50) titers of 10(7.7) viruses/mL were achieved 20h post infection, but infectivity was below detection limit after 150 h. Cell attachment onto microcarriers under serum-free conditions was improved by Ca(2+) addition and by cell harvesting without trypsin using only an EDTA/PBS solution. For the wave cultivation maximum virus titers of 2.3-2.6 log HA units/100 microL were reached from infection with a moi of 0.05. However, in SF medium pH dropped to less than pH 6.8 which resulted in lower HA titers of 1.7 log HA units/100 microL. For the higher microcarrier concentration (4 g/L) medium exchange steps (500 mL) were needed for both media. Omission of the washing step and medium exchange before infection in SF medium clearly simplified the influenza production process; however, for higher virus yields a better pH control of the wave bioreactor would be required. Higher cell densities (2.8 x 10(6) cells/mL for 2 g/L microcarrier) and better attachment compared to stirred tank bioreactors showed, that the wave bioreactor is a good alternative to stirred tank processes for expanding production capacities in case of a pandemic.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]