These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed


  • Title: Factors relating to the vertigo control and hearing changes following intratympanic gentamicin for intractable Ménière's disease.
    Author: Horii A, Saika T, Uno A, Nishiike S, Mitani K, Nishimura M, Kitahara T, Fukushima M, Nakagawa A, Masumura C, Sasaki T, Kizawa K, Kubo T.
    Journal: Otol Neurotol; 2006 Sep; 27(6):896-900. PubMed ID: 16788414.
    Abstract:
    OBJECTIVE: To look for factors relating to the vertigo control and hearing changes after intratympanic injections of gentamicin (GM). STUDY DESIGN: Prospective. SETTING: Tertiary referral medical center. PATIENTS: Twenty-eight patients with intractable Ménière's disease. INTERVENTIONS: Three intratympanic injections of GM (once per day for three consecutive days). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Although five patients needed further GM injections or vestibular neurectomy because of poor control (Group I), 23 patients had their vertigo controlled for more than two years without further treatment (Group II). The number of vertigo spells per month, pure-tone audiometry, electrocochleography, caloric response, post-head shake nystagmus, and plasma vasopressin as a stress marker were examined. RESULTS: Before GM injections, there was no difference in the number of vertigo spells per month between Groups I and II. However, the hearing thresholds were higher in Group I. Hearing improvement, increase in percentage of canal paresis and induction of post-head shake nystagmus were observed after GM injections only in Group II. Even in the 11 patients who showed an improvement in hearing of more than 10 dB (hearing improvement group), percentage of canal paresis was increased after GM. More, premedication plasma vasopressin levels were lower in the hearing improvement group as compared with the hearing loss/no changes group. Four of eight patients became negative for dominant negative summating potential in electrocochleography after GM injections in the hearing improvement group. CONCLUSION: Our data indicate that the frequency of vertigo is not a key factor in the vertigo control after GM injections, that induction of vestibular damage in the injected ear is essential for the control of vertigo and this effect is mostly pronounced in patients with milder hearing loss, and that hearing improvement is not only a consequence of good vertigo control but also affected by the stress level before treatment.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]