These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: The utility of implantable loop recorders for diagnosing unexplained syncope in 100 consecutive patients: five-year, single-center experience.
    Author: Inamdar V, Mehta S, Juang G, Cohen T.
    Journal: J Invasive Cardiol; 2006 Jul; 18(7):313-5. PubMed ID: 16816436.
    Abstract:
    INTRODUCTION: The purpose of this study was to retrospectively review the 5-year experience of a university hospital with implantable loop recorders (ILR) for the diagnosis of recurrent, unexplained syncope or presyncope. METHODS: One hundred patients with syncope or presyncope of unknown etiology (negative tilt-table test, electrophysiology study and neurologic workup) underwent prolonged monitoring with an ILR from March 2000 to December 2004. All implants were performed using a first-generation (manual activation) or second-generation (manual plus automatic activation) ILR. RESULTS: One hundred patients (70 women, 30 men) with a mean age of 68 +/- 18 years received the ILR. Twenty-three patients had coronary artery disease; 2 patients had dilated cardiomyopathy. Ten patients received a first-generation ILR, and 90 patients received a second-generation ILR. After 9 +/- 8 months' follow up, ILR interrogation identified an arrhythmogenic etiology to the syncope/presyncope in 45 patients with 55 events. Eight patients had a diagnosis by ILR less than 2 months from the date of implantation. Twenty-six patients had documented symptomatic bradycardia (asystole, sinus pauses, atrial fibrillation with long pauses); 11 patients had episodes of sinus tachycardia with heart rates of 130 to 140 beats/minute; 2 patients had atrial tachycardia; 5 patients had multiple episodes of nonsustained ventricular tachycardia (NSVT); 1 patient had sustained ventricular tachycardia, and 4 patients had paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia. All arrhythmias were treated successfully by pacemaker/ICD implantation, radiofrequency catheter ablation and/or medications. One patient had seizure activity, which was detected by ILR as high-frequency noise. Two patients failed to activate their device, as it was a first-generation device. CONCLUSION: Five-year experience with the ILR in 100 consecutive patients confirms the utility of this device in the diagnosis of recurrent, infrequent, unexplained syncope or presyncope. It helped diagnose 45% of patients with unexplained syncope with negative electrophysiologic and neurologic workup. Most of these patients had an arrhythmogenic etiology to their syncope. Medical therapy, device therapy, and/or catheter ablation helped successfully treat all patients with an arrhythmogenic etiology detected by ILR.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]