These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: First principle computational study on the full conformational space of L-proline diamides.
    Author: Sahai MA, Kehoe TA, Koo JC, Setiadi DH, Chass GA, Viskolcz B, Penke B, Pai EF, Csizmadia IG.
    Journal: J Phys Chem A; 2005 Mar 24; 109(11):2660-79. PubMed ID: 16833573.
    Abstract:
    Ab initio molecular orbital computations were carried out at three levels of theory: RHF/3-21G, RHF/6-31G(d), and B3LYP/6-31G(d), on four model systems of the amino acid proline, HCO-Pro-NH2 [I], HCO-Pro-NH-Me [II], MeCO-Pro-NH2 [III], and MeCO-Pro-NH-Me [IV], representing a systematic variation in the protecting N- and C-terminal groups. Three previously located backbone conformations, gammaL, epsilonL, and alphaL, were characterized together with two ring-puckered forms syn (gauche+ = g+) or "DOWN" and anti (gauche- = g-) or "UP", as well as trans-trans, trans-cis, cis-trans, and cis-cis peptide bond isomers. The topologies of the conformational potential energy cross-sections (PECS) of the potential energy hypersurfaces (PEHS) for compounds [I]-[IV] were explored and analyzed in terms of potential energy curves (PEC), and HCO-Pro-NH2 [I] was also analyzed in terms of potential energy surfaces (PESs). Thermodynamic functions were also calculated for HCO-Pro-NH2 [I] at the CBS-4M and G3MP2 levels of theory. The study confirms that the use of the simplest model, compound [I] with P(N) = P(C) = H, along with the RHF/3-21G level of theory, is an acceptable practice for the analysis of peptide models because only minor differences in geometry and stability are observed.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]