These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Efficacy of BACTEC TB in the rapid confirmatory diagnosis of mycobacterial infections. A Lebanese tertiary care center experience.
    Author: Itani LY, Cherry MA, Araj GF.
    Journal: J Med Liban; 2005; 53(4):208-12. PubMed ID: 16836023.
    Abstract:
    OBJECTIVES: Rapid detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis (MTB), especially multidrug-resistant strains, is of importance for prompt clinical management and initiation of public health control measures. Culture remains the "gold" standard in the confirmatory laboratory diagnosis of mycobacterial infections. The reliability of the automated radiometric BACTEC 460 TB (BACTEC) system for the rapid detection of mycobacteria in clinical specimens was evaluated and compared to the conventional culture on Lowenstein-Jensen (LJ) medium. METHODS: All clinical specimens submitted for mycobacterial culture were processed and simultaneously cultured on both BACTEC broth medium and LJ solid medium. Acid-fast bacilli (AFB) smears were also performed on the sediments. Differentiation of mycobacterial isolates as MTB or Mycobacterium sp. other than tuberculosis (MOTT) was based on the BACTEC NAP test. All positive culture findings recovered between January 1997 and December 2003 were analyzed in this study. RESULTS: A total of 3300 specimens were tested of which 355 (10.7%) yielded positive cultures consisting of 233 (65.6%) MTB and 122 (34.4%) MOTT. The percentages of AFB smear-positive were 45% and 49% in clinical specimens yielding MTB & MOTT, respectively. Though several types of specimens were cultured, most isolates (72% of MTB & 91% of MOTT) were recovered from respiratory specimens. Overall, the BACTEC showed significantly higher mycobacteria recovery rate (91%) than LJ (77%). In terms of times to detection, BACTEC showed significantly shorter detection time of isolates than LJ for the overall (mean 9.6 days for BACTEC vs. 22.8 days for LJ) and for each category of AFB smear finding. The detection time is shortened for BACTEC with the increasing grade of smear positivity. CONCLUSIONS: BACTEC is substantially more sensitive, efficient and rapid than LJ in the laboratory diagnosis of mycobacterial infections. This system also provides rapid differentiation of MTB from MOTT and susceptibility test results on MTB. However, the simultaneous use of BACTEC and LJ is recommended to provide maximum optimal recovery of isolates from clinical specimens. The time-saving in BACTEC provides an excellent facility for physicians in patient management and to public health personnel for prompt initiation of infection control measures.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]