These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Planned cesarean versus planned vaginal delivery at term: comparison of newborn infant outcomes.
    Author: Kolås T, Saugstad OD, Daltveit AK, Nilsen ST, Øian P.
    Journal: Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2006 Dec; 195(6):1538-43. PubMed ID: 16846577.
    Abstract:
    OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to examine neonatal outcomes among women with a planned cesarean and a planned vaginal delivery at term. STUDY DESIGN: This prospective survey was conducted on 18,653 singleton deliveries that represent 24 maternity units during a 6-month period. The data were retrieved from the Medical Birth Registry of Norway and analyzed according to intended mode of delivery. RESULTS: Compared with planned vaginal deliveries, planned cesarean delivery increased transfer rates to the neonatal intensive care unit from 5.2% to 9.8% (P < .001). The risk for pulmonary disorders (transient tachypnea of the newborn infant and respiratory distress syndrome) rose from 0.8% to 1.6% (P = .01). There were no significant differences in the risks for low Apgar score and neurologic symptoms. CONCLUSION: A planned cesarean delivery doubled both the rate of transfer to the neonatal intensive care unit and the risk for pulmonary disorders, compared with a planned vaginal delivery.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]