These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Unified rate-dependent atrioventricular nodal function: consistent recovery and fatigue properties revealed with S1S2S3 protocols and different recovery indexes.
    Author: Tadros R, Lavallée M, Billette J.
    Journal: Heart Rhythm; 2006 Aug; 3(8):959-66. PubMed ID: 16876747.
    Abstract:
    BACKGROUND: Rate-dependent nodal properties are commonly assessed with premature protocols performed at different basic rates. Because characteristics of responses differ with recovery time index, the true nature of nodal rate-dependent properties is elusive. OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to reveal consistent nodal rate-dependent properties regardless of selected recovery index. METHODS: With S(1)S(2)S(3) protocols, we independently varied basic and pretest cycle lengths and thereby distinguished cumulative from noncumulative effects of rate on nodal conduction time in rabbit heart preparations. Nodal responses to 30 basic and pretest cycle length combinations (five with identical basic and pretest cycles as in standard protocols) were analyzed using both atrial (AA) and His-atrial (HA) intervals as recovery index. RESULTS: AA and HA curves had an identical shape for any of 30 steady-state conditions. When assessed with constant pretest cycle lengths, cumulative effects (fatigue) of shortened basic cycle lengths were also independent of recovery index. Shortening of pretest cycle length at fixed basic rates led to apparent inhibitory and facilitatory effects when assessed with AA and HA curves, respectively. These effects vanished when a single long cycle was inserted after the pretest cycle. In all responses including those obtained with standard protocols, combined effects of basic and pretest cycle lengths set nodal conduction time. CONCLUSION: S(1)S(2)S(3) protocols reveal consistent nodal recovery and fatigue properties regardless of recovery index used. Changes in nodal function curves arising from the use of different recovery indexes mainly depend on pretest effects. This study provides a new approach to a unified interpretation of nodal recovery and fatigue properties.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]