These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Comparing the prothrombin time INR versus the APTT to evaluate the coagulopathy of acute trauma.
    Author: Yuan S, Ferrell C, Chandler WL.
    Journal: Thromb Res; 2007; 120(1):29-37. PubMed ID: 16887171.
    Abstract:
    INTRODUCTION: In trauma patients, PT/INR or aPTT cutoffs of > or =1.5x normal are often used as triggers for the transfusion of plasma. MATERIAL AND METHODS: To evaluate the ability of the PT/INR or aPTT to predict low coagulation factor levels, these tests were compared to coagulation factor levels in samples with artificially prepared single and multiple factor deficiencies, 9 heparin-contaminated samples, 10 lupus inhibitor-containing samples, 21 samples with elevated factor VIII levels, and 35 samples from acute trauma patients. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: The PT/INR and aPTT showed comparable sensitivity for single or multiple factor deficiencies in artificially deficient plasmas, but the PT/INR was more sensitive than the aPTT to low coagulation factor levels in actual trauma patients (sensitivity 84% versus 50%). The aPTT can show false positives with lupus anticoagulants and heparin contamination and false negatives in samples with elevated factor VIII. Thus, in the acute trauma setting, the PT/INR cutoff is a more reliable indicator of reduced coagulation factor levels.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]