These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed


  • Title: Clinical dose-volume histogram analysis in predicting radiation pneumonitis in Hodgkin's lymphoma.
    Author: Koh ES, Sun A, Tran TH, Tsang R, Pintilie M, Hodgson DC, Wells W, Heaton R, Gospodarowicz MK.
    Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2006 Sep 01; 66(1):223-8. PubMed ID: 16904523.
    Abstract:
    PURPOSE: To quantify the incidence of radiation pneumonitis (RP) in a modern Hodgkin's lymphoma (HL) cohort, and to identify any clinically relevant parameters that may influence the risk of RP. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Between January 2003 and February 2005, 64 consecutive HL patients aged 18 years or older receiving radical mediastinal radiation therapy (RT) were retrospectively reviewed. Symptomatic cases of radiation pneumonitis were identified. Dose-volume histogram parameters, including V(13), V(20), V(30), and mean lung dose (MLD), were quantified. RESULTS: At a median follow-up of 2.1 years, the actuarial survival for all patients was 91% at 3 years. There were 2 (2/64) cases of Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) Grade 2 RP (incidence 3.1%). Both index cases with corresponding V(20) values of 47.0% and 40.7% were located in the upper quartile (2/16 cases), defined by a V(20) value of > or =36%, an incidence of 12.5% (p = 0.03). Similarly for total MLD, both index cases with values of 17.6 Gy and 16.4 Gy, respectively, were located in the upper quartile defined by MLD > or =14.2 Gy, an incidence of 11.8% (2/17 cases, p = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: Despite relatively high V(20) values in this study of HL patients, the incidence of RP was only 3%, lower compared with the lung cancer literature. We suggest the following clinically relevant parameters be considered in treatment plan assessment: a V(20) greater than 36% and an MLD greater than 14 Gy, over and above which the risk of RTOG Grade 2 or greater RP would be considered clinically significant.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]