These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Retrospective financial analysis of wellness center from an independent community pharmacy perspective.
    Author: Kent K, McDonough RP, Dinges B, Doucette WR.
    Journal: J Am Pharm Assoc (2003); 2006; 46(4):447-52. PubMed ID: 16913387.
    Abstract:
    OBJECTIVE: To determine the net financial gain or loss from health screening services provided to patients at an independent community pharmacy-based wellness center. DESIGN: Retrospective review of pharmacy wellness center records over a 24-month period. SETTING: A wellness center at one independent community pharmacy. PARTICIPANTS: Patients receiving one or more of nine different services (blood pressure [BP], blood glucose, body fat [BF], glycosylated hemoglobin [A1C], bone density [BD], total cholesterol/blood glucose, total lipid panel [TLP], total cholesterol/high-density lipoprotein, alanine aminotransferase) during a 2-year period. INTERVENTIONS: The services were performed and results recorded by a resident or staff pharmacist. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Using a pharmacy perspective, net financial gains or losses were calculated for each of the individual services, for all of the services performed using the Cholestech LDX Analyzer, and for the wellness center as a whole. Sensitivity analyses were based upon a pharmacist, a pharmacy resident, or both a pharmacist and pharmacy resident each providing half of the total number of services over the 2-year period. RESULTS: A total of 1,181 pharmacy records for the selected services were reviewed for the specified time period. A net financial gain for the wellness center was achieved when the services were performed by a pharmacist, a pharmacy resident, or a pharmacist/pharmacy resident combination, respectively. Three of the individual services (BG, BF and TLP) and assays performed using the Cholestech LDX Analyzer had a net financial gain for each sensitivity analysis. Two of the services (BP and AIC) had a net financial gain only when a resident provided the service. One of the services (BD) had a net financial loss for all of analyses. CONCLUSION: Revenues for these services exceeded their costs from the wellness center perspective when they were performed by a pharmacist, a pharmacy resident, or a pharmacist/pharmacy resident combination.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]