These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Search MEDLINE/PubMed
Title: No association between the polymorphisms in matrix metalloproteinase-1 and matrix metalloproteinase-3 promoter regions and colorectal cancer in Chinese. Author: Xu E, Lai M, Lŭ B, Xing X, Huang Q. Journal: Dis Colon Rectum; 2006 Sep; 49(9):1439-44. PubMed ID: 16937230. Abstract: PURPOSE: Matrix metalloproteinase-1 and matrix metalloproteinase-3 are implicated in all steps of cancer initiation, invasion, and metastasis. Recently, several genetic studies have demonstrated that matrix metalloproteinase-1-1607 ins/delG (1G/2G) polymorphism and matrix metalloproteinase-3-1612 ins/delA (5A/6A) polymorphism modify each transcriptional activity in allele-specific manners. In this study, we investigated whether these functional polymorphisms are associated with colorectal cancer in a Chinese population. METHODS: Matrix metalloproteinase-1 and matrix metalloproteinase-3 genotypings were performed on 126 pathologically diagnosed colorectal cancer patients and 126 age-matched and gender-matched controls by polymerase chain reaction-based denaturing high-performance liquid chromatography analysis or restriction fragment length polymorphism, respectively. RESULTS: The distributions of the matrix metalloproteinase-1 and matrix metalloproteinase-3 genotypes in healthy control subjects were inconsistent with Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium. Neither the genotype frequencies nor allele frequencies of matrix metalloproteinase-1 and matrix metalloproteinase-3 polymorphisms showed significant difference from those in healthy control subjects. There also were no significant associations between matrix metalloproteinase-1 and matrix metalloproteinase-3 genotypes and clinicopathologic features. When we examined the linkage disequilibrium between these two single nucleotide polymorphisms using expectation-maximization algorithm, we found that the two single nucleotide polymorphisms were in a strong linkage disequilibrium, but no significant difference was found in haplotype distribution. CONCLUSIONS: Our present data suggest that the matrix metalloproteinase-1 and matrix metalloproteinase-3 promoter polymorphisms may not be useful markers to predicate susceptibility of colorectal cancer in Chinese.[Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]