These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Search MEDLINE/PubMed
Title: Galanin binding sites in rat gastric and jejunal smooth muscle membrane preparations. Author: Rossowski WJ, Rossowski TM, Zacharia S, Ertan A, Coy DH. Journal: Peptides; 1990; 11(2):333-8. PubMed ID: 1694029. Abstract: Receptors for galanin in membranes from the rat gastric and jejunal smooth muscle were studied using [125I] radioiodinated synthetic porcine galanin. Specific binding was time and temperature dependent. At 32 degrees C radioligand was degraded in the presence of smooth muscle membranes in a time-dependent manner. At optimal experimental conditions, the equilibrium binding analyses showed the presence of a single population of high affinity binding sites in both the rat stomach and jejunum (Kd value of 2.77 +/- 0.78 nM and 4.93 +/- 1.74 nM for stomach and jejunal smooth muscle membranes, respectively). The concentration of the high affinity binding sites was 58.19 +/- 11.04 and 32.36 +/- 5.68 fmol/mg protein, for gastric and jejunal preparations, respectively. Specific binding was completely inhibited by 10(-6) M of nonradioactive galanin; was 75% blocked by 1 microM of galanin(9-29); it was 10% blocked by 1 microM of galanin(15-29). Galanin(1-15) at a concentration of 1 microM was ineffective for inhibiting [125I]galanin binding. Deletion of four C-terminal amino acid residues from galanin(9-29) to give galanin(9-25) also resulted in almost complete loss of affinity. Radioiodinated galanin and N-terminally deleted fragments had receptor binding potency in the following order: galanin(1-29) greater than galanin(9-29) greater than galanin(15-29). We conclude that the C-terminal part of the galanin chain is important for the rat gastric and jejunal smooth muscle membrane receptor recognition and binding and that N-terminal amino acid sequences are probably not so important, since galanin(1-15) was not active but galanin(9-29) retained most of the receptor binding activity.[Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]