These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: [Blood samples with hemolysis: clinical consequences?].
    Author: Nybo M, Nielsen HR, Hansen AB.
    Journal: Ugeskr Laeger; 2006 Aug 14; 168(33):2653-5. PubMed ID: 16942683.
    Abstract:
    Hemolysis affects many biochemical analyses, and when pronounced the result is replaced by an autoreply pointing out the hemolysis present. However, for proper treatment it is crucial to know whether hemolysis is due to sampling (in vitro) or is taking place in the patient (in vivo). At present, no consensus exists on how to help clinicians differentiate between the two. Clinical surveillance is still necessary, and a future challenge will be improving the dialogue between clinicians and clinical biochemists. This article reviews the benefits of doing so and suggests procedures to help differentiate.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]