These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: [Trial on the objective evaluation of visual acuity and its maturation by the method of evoked visual potentials].
    Author: Marechal L, Faidherbe J.
    Journal: Arch Int Physiol Biochim; 1990 Apr; 98(2):TD1-96. PubMed ID: 1695084.
    Abstract:
    We have developed a method to estimate foveal visual acuity (VA) through analysis of VEPs. It consists in determining the smallest check size in a pattern reversal that elicits a significant cortical response. The VEP is regarded as significant if the P 100 amplitude reaches a pre-established level in the signal to noise ratio. A valid criterion to determine normal VEP-VA emerges from the testing of 84 emmetropic and ametropic eyes: within our stimulation and recording conditions, a significant VEP response to the reversal of seven minutes checks corresponds to normal foveal acuity. This criterion has also proved pertinent to discriminate between normal VAs of 20/20 and decreased VAs (20/40 or less) with four other groups of subjects: 14 adult eyes whose VAs of 20/20 are decreased through Bangerter occlusives, 32 emmetropic and ametropic eyes belonging to five-years-olds children, 28 emmetropic and ametropic eyes of twelve-years-olds. In order to guarantee the validity of our results we carried out a double-blind study with ophthalmologists. The relevance of the method we suggest is related to that of the method which consists in extrapolating the regression line between VEP amplitudes and the pattern element sizes. At least we have aimed at establishing VEP norms for the maturation of VA. We have collected data from the following subjects: 5 infants tested monthly between 1 and 6 months, 31 infants ranging in age from 1 to 16 months, 10 five-year-old children, 13 twelve-year-olds, and 11 subjects aged 20. Within our stimulation and recording conditions a significant evoked response to the reversal of seven minute checks can be observed from 8 months onward. With an eight-month-old infant this response to the reversal of seven minute checks cannot be identified to the same response with an adult. There are two major differences: the latency of the major positive component is longer, and the structure of the evoked response consists of fewer components.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]