These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Inhibitors of factor VIIa affect the interface between the protease domain and tissue factor.
    Author: Carlsson K, Persson E, Carlsson U, Svensson M.
    Journal: Biochem Biophys Res Commun; 2006 Oct 27; 349(3):1111-6. PubMed ID: 16970919.
    Abstract:
    Blood coagulation is triggered by the formation of a complex between factor VIIa (FVIIa) and its cofactor, tissue factor (TF). The gamma-carboxyglutamic acid-rich domain of FVIIa docks with the C-terminal domain of TF, the EGF1 domain of FVIIa contacts both domains of TF, and the EGF2 domain and protease domain (PD) form a continuous surface that sits on the N-terminal domain of TF. Our aim was to investigate the conformational changes that occur in the sTF.PD binding region when different types of inhibitors, i.e., one active-site inhibitor (FFR-chloromethyl ketone (FFR)), two different peptide exosite inhibitors (E-76 and A-183), and the natural inhibitor tissue factor pathway inhibitor (TFPI), were allowed to bind to FVIIa. For this purpose, we constructed two sTF mutants (Q37C and E91C). By the aid of site-directed labeling technique, a fluorescent label was attached to the free cysteine. The sTF.PD interface was affected in position 37 by the binding of FFR, TFPI, and E-76, i.e., a more compact structure was sensed by the probe, while for position 91 located in the same region no change in the surrounding structure was observed. Thus, the active site inhibitors FFR and TFPI, and the exosite inhibitor E-76 have similar effects on the probe in position 37 of sTF, despite their differences in size and inhibition mechanism. The allosteric changes at the active site caused by binding of the exosite inhibitor E-76 in turn induce similar conformational changes in the sTF.PD interface as does the binding of the active site inhibitors. A-183, on the other hand, did not affect position 37 in sTF, indicating that the A-183 inhibition mechanism is different from that of E-76.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]