These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Dissatisfaction with Do Not Attempt Resuscitation Orders: A nationwide study of Irish consultant physician practices.
    Author: Butler MW, Saaidin N, Sheikh AA, Fennell JS.
    Journal: Ir Med J; 2006; 99(7):208-10. PubMed ID: 16986566.
    Abstract:
    The legal/ethical status of Do Not Attempt Resuscitation (DNAR) orders in Ireland has not been clarified, nor have national policies been formulated. We questioned 298 consultant physicians in the Republic of Ireland about DNAR orders. 173 replies were received (58%). 85 expressed unsatisfactory understanding of issues relating to Irish DNAR orders (49%). 116 physicians felt that alert patients preferred not to discuss their own resuscitation (67%). 55 physicians felt that if a competent adult patient is the subject of a DNAR order without the patient's knowledge, the reasons for this decision are "almost never" documented in the patient's medical record (32%). 75 consultants "almost never" had advance discussion of resuscitation preferences with the patient (43%). 47 physicians had experienced advance directives for Irish patients (27%). 102 physicians felt that both they and the patient's next of kin had joint responsibility for deciding resuscitation status for an incapacitated patient with no advance directive (59%). 37 respondents described a formal resuscitation policy in their place of work (21%). We feel that physicians require greater national guidance regarding DNAR order-making, and we advocate more widespread use of resuscitation policies.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]