These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Acute effects of knowledge-based work on feeding behavior and energy intake.
    Author: Chaput JP, Tremblay A.
    Journal: Physiol Behav; 2007 Jan 30; 90(1):66-72. PubMed ID: 17023010.
    Abstract:
    The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of knowledge-based work (KBW) on feeding behavior and spontaneous energy intake with the use of a repeated measures/within-subjects design. We used a two-session protocol including an ad libitum buffet preceded by either rest in a sitting position for 45 min or a cognitive task (reading a document and writing a summary of 350 words using a computer) over the same time period. In this regard, 15 healthy Laval University female students (mean age = 24.1+/-2.2 years, mean BMI = 24.0+/-4.3 kg/m2) were recruited to participate in this study. Anthropometric variables, energy expenditure, heart rate, blood pressure, food intake (dietary record), and appetite sensation markers were measured at each testing session, and two questionnaires [Three-Factor Eating Questionnaire (TFEQ) and State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI)] were administered. In addition, a buffet-type meal was used to measure spontaneous energy intake and macronutrient preferences. We found that the mean energy expenditure of the two conditions was about comparable (difference of 13 kJ between the two tasks) whereas the mean ad libitum energy intake after the KBW task exceeded that measured after rest by 959 kJ (p < 0.01). Although a higher absolute energy intake was observed for the three macronutrients after the KBW task (p < 0.05), no specific preference was detected, as reflected by the comparable percent of energy from each macronutrient in the two conditions. No significant difference in appetite sensation markers was observed between the two conditions, although the subjects ate more in the buffet-type meal after the KBW task. Furthermore, the subjects did not compensate by decreasing food intake for the rest of the day, suggesting a net caloric surplus. We also observed negative correlations between cognitive dietary restraint (TFEQ) and spontaneous energy intake in both conditions. In conclusion, our results demonstrate that mental work solicited by KBW has the potential to induce a higher spontaneous energy intake. This also raises the possibility that KBW adds a new component to sedentariness that might further accentuate the positive energy balance that is more likely to occur when one is inactive.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]