These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibition reduces lipid deposits in myocardium and improves left ventricular function of obese zucker rats.
    Author: Toblli JE, Cao G, Rivas C, DeRosa G, Domecq P.
    Journal: Obesity (Silver Spring); 2006 Sep; 14(9):1586-95. PubMed ID: 17030970.
    Abstract:
    OBJECTIVE: Alterations in the renin angiotensin system, cardiac lipotoxicity, and left ventricular (LV) dysfunction have been reported in obese rats. The present study examined whether angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibition could ameliorate lipid deposition and ventricular function in the myocardium of obese Zucker rats (OZRs). RESEARCH METHODS AND PROCEDURES: For 6 months, rats were treated as follows: Group (G) 1, OZR, no treatment; G2, OZR + ramipril (R); G3, OZR + amlodipine (AML); and G4, lean Zucker rats. LV function was assessed by echocardiogram and lipid deposits in cardiomyocytes (LDCM) by light microscopy using Oil red O. RESULTS: At the end of the experiment, both OZR + R and OZR + AML groups presented similar reduction in blood pressure in comparison with untreated OZR (p < 0.01). OZR with R presented lower insulin-to-glucose ratio and lower serum triglycerides and cholesterol when compared with both untreated OZR and OZR with AML (p < 0.01). Fractional shortening by echocardiogram was as follows: G1, 25.4 +/- 3.8 (vs. G2 and G4, p < 0.05); G2, 37.2 +/- 2.4; G3, 29.3 +/- 4.4 (vs. G2 and G4, p < 0.05); and G4, 40.8 +/- 2.3. Percentage LDCM was as follows: G1, 12.4 +/- 2.7 (vs. G2 and G4, p < 0.05); G2, 0.8 +/- 0.2; G3, 11.1 +/- 2.1 (vs. G2 and G4, p < 0.05); and G4, 0.1 +/- 0.1. There was a negative correlation between fractional shortening and LDCM percentage in OZR (r = -0.93) and in OZR + AML (r = -0.87). DISCUSSION: AML reduced blood pressure significantly; however, it failed to modify both metabolic parameters and LDCM. In contrast, R showed a substantial reduction in LDCM, together with LV function preservation.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]