These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Differences between atrial single chamber pacing (AAI) and ventricular single chamber pacing (VVI) with respect to prognosis and antiarrhythmic effect in patients with sick sinus syndrome.
    Author: Stangl K, Seitz K, Wirtzfeld A, Alt E, Blömer H.
    Journal: Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1990 Dec; 13(12 Pt 2):2080-5. PubMed ID: 1704597.
    Abstract:
    Several studies suggest different effects of atrial (AAI) and ventricular single chamber pacing (VVI) for sick sinus syndrome with respect to the suppression of atrial tachycardias and to the prognosis. With this aspect in mind, we studied 222 patients with sick sinus syndrome, 110 of whom had been supplied with AAI systems, and 112 with VVI systems, in the period from January 1978 to December 1986. The mean observation period was 53 +/- 28 months. The cumulative 5-year survival rate was not significantly different in the two groups. After subgroups with comparable underlying diseases had been differentiated, patients with coronary heart disease showed a significantly higher survival rate (P less than 0.05) under AAI pacing, and the same was shown for patients with no underlying heart disease (P less than 0.02). The incidence of chronic atrial fibrillation was 6% in the AAI group and 19% in the VVI group. Patients with preexisting atrial tachyarrhythmias showed the lowest incidence of chronic atrial fibrillation under AAI pacing. Under VVI pacing this incidence was a function of the basic rate of the pacemaker systems. In conclusion, the pacing mode seems to have a prognostic importance in spite of all methodological difficulties. A suppressive effect of AAI pacing on atrial dysrhythmias can also be assumed.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]