These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed


  • Title: [Middle molecules removal. Beyond beta2-microglobulin].
    Author: Maduell F, Sánchez-Canel JJ, Blasco JA, Navarro V, Ríus A, Torregrosa E, Pin MT, Cruz C, Ferrero JA.
    Journal: Nefrologia; 2006; 26(4):469-75. PubMed ID: 17058859.
    Abstract:
    The uremic toxin removal capacity mainly depends on dialyzer and hemodialysis modes. The low-flux hemodialysis only removes solutes having molecular weights less than 5.000 Da. High-flux hemodyalisis represents a form of low-volume hemodiafiltration because of the internal filtration and back-filtration that can take place within a dialyzer. Hemodiafiltration with large volumes of replacement fluid seems to be the best technique for removing all small, medium-sized and large molecules. The objective of our study was to evaluate the large molecules removal bigger than beta2-microglobuline on high flux haemodialysis and on-line hemodiafiltration with postdilutional infusion, in patients with three times a week dialysis and on short daily dialysis. We studied 24 patients, 15 males and 9 females stable on haemodialysis programme, twelve on standard four to five hours three times a week dialysis and twelve on 2 to 2 1/2 hours six times a week dialysis. All patients were dialysed with Fresenius 4008 monitor, three sessions on high flux haemodialysis (HD) and three sessions on on-line hemodiafiltration (OL-HDF). Two sessions with each filter were performed (polisulfone HF80, polyethersulfone Arylane H9 and new polisulfone APS 900). Pre and postdialysis concentrations of urea, creatinine, (beta2-microglobulin (beta2-m), myoglobin, prolactin and alpha1 microglobulin (alpha1-m) were measured. There was no difference in urea and creatinine small molecules removal. beta2m removal was 68% on HD and 81% on OL-HDF. Myoglobin and prolactin present a similar removal pattern, a higher removal with new filters (60% with Arylane and 59% with APS) in comparison with clasical polisulfone (22% with HF80). The mean alpha1-m reduction rate on HD was 6% and on OL-HDF 22%. OL-HDF with APS 900 filter was the most remove technique (35.4%), significatively higher than the other modes and filters. We can conclude that the new filters generation reach a better uremic toxins removal, specially in large molecules higher than beta2-m and on HD modality.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]