These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Prediction of surface roughness using X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy and neural networks.
    Author: Kim B, Park MG.
    Journal: Appl Spectrosc; 2006 Oct; 60(10):1192-7. PubMed ID: 17059673.
    Abstract:
    A new model for controlling plasma processes was constructed by combining atomic force microscopy (AFM), X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS), and neural networks. The applicability of XPS to modeling etch rate was also investigated, as well as the impact of dc bias inclusion. The back-propagation neural network was used to find complex relationships between XPS and AFM data. This technique was evaluated with the etching data characterized by a 2(4) full factorial experiment. Five prediction models of surface roughness were constructed and compared. The Type I model refers to the model constructed with conventional process parameters. The Type II and III models were built with XPS and XPS plus dc bias data, respectively. The remaining Type IV and V models refer to those constructed with principal component analysis (PCA) reduced-XPS and PCA reduced-XPS plus dc bias, respectively. Mode prediction performance was evaluated as a function of training factor. In predicting the surface roughness, the Type II model yielded an improved prediction of 39% with respect to the Type IV model. The improvement was also demonstrated in modeling the etch rate. These results indicate that utilizing full XPS data is more effective for improving the model prediction performance. The advantage of XPS data was more conspicuous in constructing the surface roughness model.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]