These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: [Structural valve deterioration of aortic bioprostheses and reoperation in octogenarians. Results and risk factors for survival].
    Author: Eitz T, Zittermann A, Fritzsche D, Kleikamp G, Körtke H, Körfer R.
    Journal: Herz; 2006 Oct; 31(7):699-703. PubMed ID: 17072786.
    Abstract:
    BACKGROUND: Due to increasing life expectancy of patients with heart valve replacement and a limited durability of heart valve bioprostheses, replacement of aortic valve prosthesis becomes necessary in a significant percentage of patients. However, reliable data on mortality and its risk factors in octogenarians after replacement of aortic bioprostheses are limited. PATIENTS AND METHODS: 56 patients aged > or = 80 years who underwent cardiac reoperation of a bioprosthesis due to structural valve deterioration at the authors' heart center between 1991 and 2004 were analyzed retrospectively. To assess predictors of 30-day and 3-year survival, uni- and multivariate Cox regression analyses were performed. RESULTS: 30-day, 1-year, 3-year, and 5-year survival rates were 81.1%, 71.3%, 67.5%, and 50.8%, respectively. Patients with reoperation had an estimated median survival of 5.0 years. Patients who survived their in-hospital stay had a very similar life expectancy compared with the general German population. Postoperative complications such as low cardiac output syndrome and intestinal failure were the only independent predictors of 30-day and 3-year survival (p < 0.001). Postoperative New York Heart Association functional class improved markedly in the study cohort and the majority of survivors was able to live at home. As we cannot offer these patients an alternative effective medical therapy, octogenarians who need their aortic valve prosthesis to be replaced are left in a miserable condition with a poor prognosis, if surgery is denied. Therefore, considering that almost the same criteria are used for younger patients with the emphasis that surgery should not be delayed until they are highly symptomatic, reoperation of the aortic valve in this age group is justified. CONCLUSION: The data demonstrate that it is possible to achieve an acceptable outcome in octogenarians who are in need of a replacement of their aortic valve prosthesis. Early as well as mid-term survival are predominantly influenced by unexpected postoperative complications.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]