These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Treatment decision-making for older patients with high-risk myelodysplastic syndrome or acute myeloid leukemia: problems and approaches.
    Author: Deschler B, de Witte T, Mertelsmann R, Lübbert M.
    Journal: Haematologica; 2006 Nov; 91(11):1513-22. PubMed ID: 17082009.
    Abstract:
    BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: High-risk myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) and acute myeloid leukemia (AML) are mainly diseases of patients over the age of 60 years. In these patients, intensive chemotherapy and/or allogeneic blood stem cell transplantation are the only curative treatment approaches, while non-curative options include low-dose chemotherapy or best supportive care alone. The basis for treatment decision-making in this clinically and biologically heterogeneous group is not well defined. DESIGN AND METHODS: In order to investigate treatment stratification patterns and outcomes in this population, we performed a systematic literature search in MedLine for relevant clinical reports published between 1989 and 2006. Only large population-based investigations and publications of clinical trials with more than 40 patients were analyzed. RESULTS: In 36 AML studies involving a total of 12,370 patients (median age 70 years) median overall survival approached 30 weeks for intensively treated patients. In patients receiving best supportive care alone, or best supportive care plus non-intensive treatment, median overall survival was 7.5 and 12 weeks, respectively. The complete remission rate after induction was 44%, and in those patients who achieved complete remission age no longer influenced prognosis. In 18 large studies approximately 50% of AML patients received induction therapy, 30% non-intensive chemotherapy and 20% supportive care only. INTERPRETATION AND CONCLUSIONS: Due to the scarcity of randomized AML/MDS trials in which older patients are assigned to either induction or less intense therapy, predictors to identify older patients most likely to benefit from intensive therapy and novel tools to optimize (or even standardize) recommendations are needed. We propose that in this patient population in the future, geriatric assessment instruments and comorbidity scoring are implemented in treatment decision-making.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]