These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Evaluation of the formocresol versus mineral trioxide aggregate primary molar pulpotomy: a meta-analysis.
    Author: Peng L, Ye L, Tan H, Zhou X.
    Journal: Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2006 Dec; 102(6):e40-4. PubMed ID: 17138165.
    Abstract:
    OBJECTIVE: To apply meta-analysis to compare the clinical and radiographic effects of mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA) with formocresol (FC) when used as wound dressing for pulpotomy of primary molars. STUDY DESIGN: The study list was obtained by searching MEDLINE, The Cochrane Library, EMBASE, and SCI. Only those papers that met the inclusion criteria were analyzed. RESULTS: Six studies met the inclusion criteria. There was significant difference between the success rates of FC- and MTA-treated pulpotomized primary molars (P < .05). Clinical assessments and radiographic findings of the MTA versus FC pulpotomy suggested that MTA was superior to FC in pulpotomy resulting in a lower failure rate, with the RR (Relative Risk) being 0.32 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.11 to 0.90) and 0.31 (95% CI 0.13 to 0.74), respectively. Internal root resorption happened less in the MTA group with RR 0.29, 95% CI 0.11 to 0.77. CONCLUSION: MTA induces less undesirable responses and might be FC's suitable replacement.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]