These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Search MEDLINE/PubMed
Title: ERCP is safe and effective in patients 80 years of age and older compared with younger patients. Author: Fritz E, Kirchgatterer A, Hubner D, Aschl G, Hinterreiter M, Stadler B, Knoflach P. Journal: Gastrointest Endosc; 2006 Dec; 64(6):899-905. PubMed ID: 17140895. Abstract: BACKGROUND: Biliary disease frequently occurs in the elderly, but there are limited data on ERCP in the elderly population. PATIENTS: A total of 502 patients (group A, 97; group B, 405) underwent 724 ERCP procedures. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: All consecutive ERCPs performed between 2000 and 2002 at a single center were retrospectively reviewed for patients >/=80 years old (group A) and patients <80 years old (group B) to evaluate endoscopic findings, interventions, complications, and mortality related to complications. RESULTS: The number of important chronic concomitant diseases was significantly higher in the older group (average per patient 1.08 vs 0.57, P < .001). Successful cannulation was achieved in 88% in group A versus 86% in group B, and endoscopic sphincterotomy was performed in 63.2% versus 51.4%. Periampullary diverticulum was found significantly more often in patients of group A (39.2%) than of group B (14.1%, P < .001). Stents were used in 24.1% of ERCP procedures in group A and in 22.9% in group B. There was no significant difference in the complication rate between group A (6.8%) and group B (5.1%) and in early mortality (1.03% vs 0.25%), respectively. CONCLUSION: ERCP is a safe and effective intervention in the elderly because complication and early mortality rates are comparable to those of younger patients, although comorbidity is significantly higher.[Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]