These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Glargine versus NPH insulin: efficacy in comparison with insulin aspart in a basal bolus regimen in type 1 diabetes--the glargine and aspart study (GLASS) a randomised cross-over study.
    Author: Chatterjee S, Jarvis-Kay J, Rengarajan T, Lawrence IG, McNally PG, Davies MJ.
    Journal: Diabetes Res Clin Pract; 2007 Aug; 77(2):215-22. PubMed ID: 17141354.
    Abstract:
    The aim of the study was to compare the efficacy of insulin glargine and aspart with NPH insulin and aspart in a basal bolus regimen in type 1 diabetes. In this 36-week randomised open-label two-period cross-over trial, subjects received 16 weeks' treatment with either once-daily insulin glargine or twice-daily NPH insulin after 4-week run-in. Primary outcome was HbA1c and secondary outcomes were fasting plasma glucose (FPG), weight change, incidence of hypoglycaemia, effect on lipid profile and patient satisfaction. Sixty patients with type 1 diabetes were recruited (33 male, mean age 42.7 years, mean HbA1c 8.53%) with 53 completing the study. At completion, HbA1c was lower with glargine and aspart than with NPH and aspart (8.07% versus 8.26%, difference -0.19 [95% CI 0.37-0.01]%, p=0.04). FPG was significantly different between glargine and NPH (p=0.002), with mean FPG on glargine 3mmol/L lower than on NPH at the end of the study. There were no differences in hypoglycaemia rate (p=0.63), weight (p=0.45) or lipid profile (p=0.18). Patient satisfaction was greater with glargine (DTSQ, p=0.001). Three patients discontinued as they wished to remain on glargine. We suggest that glargine combined with aspart is an effective basal bolus regimen in type 1 diabetes.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]