These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Flow reduction in high-flow arteriovenous access using intraoperative flow monitoring.
    Author: Zanow J, Petzold K, Petzold M, Krueger U, Scholz H.
    Journal: J Vasc Surg; 2006 Dec; 44(6):1273-8. PubMed ID: 17145429.
    Abstract:
    PURPOSE: This study used intraoperative monitoring of the access flow to evaluate the results of flow reduction in the management of high-flow arteriovenous access-related symptoms of distal ischemia and cardiac insufficiency. METHODS: A retrospective study was conducted of 95 patients (78 with ischemia, 17 with cardiac failure) who underwent flow reduction between 1999 and 2005. A preoperatively measured access flow-volume rate > 800 mL/min for autogenous accesses (n = 77) and > 1200 mL/min for prosthetic accesses (n = 18) was the selection criterion for the use of a flow reduction procedure. Flow reduction was achieved using a spindle-like narrowing suture near the anastomosis and final placement of a polytetrafluoroethylene strip while a flow meter was used for intraoperatively measuring the access flow. The desired postoperative flow was 400 mL/min for autogenous and 600 mL/min for prosthetic accesses. RESULTS: The mean preoperative access flow was 1469 +/- 633 mL/min in patients with ischemia and 2084 +/- 463 mL/min in patients with cardiac failure, without significant differences between access types. The flow was reduced to 499 +/- 175 mL/min for autogenous accesses and to 676 +/- 47 mL/min for prosthetic accesses. The mean follow-up was 25 months (range, 1 to 73 months). Complete long-term relief of symptoms was observed in 86% of patients with ischemia and in 96% of patients with cardiac failure. Reconstruction significantly increased the digital-brachial index (0.41 +/- 0.12 vs 0.74 +/- 0.11; P < .05) and mean distal arterial pressure (47 +/- 17 mm Hg vs 79 +/- 21 mm Hg; P < .05) in patients with ischemia. Primary patency rates were significantly better for reconstructed autogenous accesses compared with rates of prosthetic accesses (91% +/- 4% vs 58% +/- 12% at 12 months; 81% +/- 6% vs 41% +/- 14% at 36 months; P < .001). The low patency of reconstructed prosthetic accesses is due to the high thrombosis risk of accesses that have a flow < 700 mL/min. CONCLUSIONS: Flow reduction using intraoperative access flow monitoring is an effective and durable technique allowing for the correction of distal ischemia and cardiac insufficiency in patients with a high-flow autogenous access. The desired postoperative access flow of 400 mL/min is not associated with an increased risk of thrombosis. Flow reduction of prosthetic access is as effective; however, a higher access flow than the desired 600 mL/min seems to be necessary to achieve an acceptable patency in prosthetic accesses.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]