These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Comparison of reduced-intensity and conventional myeloablative regimens for allogeneic transplantation in non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.
    Author: Rodriguez R, Nademanee A, Ruel N, Smith E, Krishnan A, Popplewell L, Zain J, Patane K, Kogut N, Nakamura R, Sarkodee-Adoo C, Forman SJ.
    Journal: Biol Blood Marrow Transplant; 2006 Dec; 12(12):1326-34. PubMed ID: 17162215.
    Abstract:
    Reduced-intensity regimens (RIRs) are being used with increasing frequency in patients with non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL) undergoing allogeneic transplantation. The impact of dose reduction on relapse and survival has not been extensively studied. We performed a retrospective analysis of 88 patients conditioned with conventional myeloablative regimens (CMRs) (n = 48) and an RIR (n = 40) of fludarabine 125 mg/m(2) and melphalan 140 mg/m(2). Compared with the patients receiving CMR, those receiving RIR were older, had more often failed autologous transplantation, and had more frequently received peripheral blood and unrelated donor transplants. Graft-versus-host disease prophylaxis was provided with cyclosporine + methotrexate +/- prednisone for the CMR and with cyclosporine + mycophenolate +/- methotrexate for the RIR. The relapse rate was significantly lower in the patients receiving CMR than in those receiving RIR (13% vs 28%; P = .05). The 1-year transplantation-related mortality rate was 33% for CMR and 28% for RIR (P = .40). Kaplan-Meier 2-year overall survival and progression-free survival were 52% and 46% for CMR versus 53% and 40% for RIR (P = not significant). Using cumulative incidence functions based on competing risks, univariate analysis, and treatment-related prognostic factors, we found that higher treatment intensity (P = .03; relative risk [RR] = 35%) and absence of previous autologous transplantation (P = .0007; RR = 20%) were associated with a lower relapse rate. Using a Cox univariate proportional hazards model, we found that chemosensitive disease at transplantation (P = .05; RR = 57%) and absence of previous autologous transplantation (P = .002; RR = 37%) were associated with improved survival. Our observation of similar survival in the patients receiving CMR and those receiving RIR confirms that RIRs are feasible alternatives for high-risk patients with NHL; however, the data suggest that reduced treatment intensity and previous autologous transplantation are associated with increased relapse.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]