These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Test-retest reliability of heart rate variability and respiration rate at rest and during light physical activity in normal subjects.
    Author: Guijt AM, Sluiter JK, Frings-Dresen MH.
    Journal: Arch Med Res; 2007 Jan; 38(1):113-20. PubMed ID: 17174734.
    Abstract:
    BACKGROUND: A variable that remains stable over repeated measurements (in stable conditions) is ideal for tracking modifications of the clinical state. The aim of the present study is to examine test-retest reliability of time-domain heart rate variability and respiration rate measurements using a portable device on normal subjects during rest and light physical activity. METHODS: Twenty-six normal subjects [18 females and 8 males aged 28 +/- 6 years and 34 +/- 12 years (mean +/- SD), respectively] underwent two measurements for time-domain heart rate variability (SDNN and RMSSD) and respiration rate, with 7 days in between. Measurements took place under three conditions: lying down in a laboratory, cycling in a laboratory and sleeping in an ambulatory surrounding. Reliability was assessed statistically by calculating intra-class correlation coefficients (ICC). RESULTS: Reliability was found to be good to excellent for both time-domain heart rate variability (SDNN: ICC values between 0.74 and 0.85, RMSSD: ICC values between 0.75 and 0.98) and for respiration rate (ICC values between 0.77 and 0.96). CONCLUSIONS: Both time-domain heart rate variability and respiration rate can be reliably assessed. However, we advise reliability research in a clinical setting before using the device for tracking modifications in a clinical state.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]