These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: A comparison of non-contact, subcutaneous, and rectal temperatures in captive owl monkeys (Aotus sp.).
    Author: Shelton LJ, White CE, Felt SA.
    Journal: J Med Primatol; 2006 Dec; 35(6):346-51. PubMed ID: 17214662.
    Abstract:
    BACKGROUND: Three methods of body temperature measurement were compared in owl monkeys: non-contact infrared thermometry, subcutaneous transponder, and rectal probe. METHODS: Forty owl monkeys (Aotus sp.) were used. Animals were implanted with subcutaneous microchip transponders. Infrared thermometry was used at three different sites. All measurements were taken and repeated randomly. RESULTS: Infrared and subcutaneous measurements did not agree well with rectal thermometry. Subcutaneous and rectal temperatures were highly repeatable, and subcutaneous temperatures were most agreeable to rectal temperatures. CONCLUSIONS: Further investigation is needed into subcutaneous implant sites and use of different infrared thermometers in this species.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]