These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Carpal kinematics after proximal row carpectomy.
    Author: Blankenhorn BD, Pfaeffle HJ, Tang P, Robertson D, Imbriglia J, Goitz RJ.
    Journal: J Hand Surg Am; 2007 Jan; 32(1):37-46. PubMed ID: 17218174.
    Abstract:
    PURPOSE: Proximal row carpectomy (PRC) is a clinically useful motion-sparing procedure for the treatment of certain degenerative conditions of the wrist. Clinical outcome studies after PRC have shown that wrist flexion-extension averages approximately 60% of that of the contralateral wrist. The purpose of this study was to determine how the kinematics of the wrist are altered after PRC. METHODS: Eight fresh-frozen cadaver forearms were scanned with computed tomography before and after PRC. Forearms were scanned in 5 different wrist positions (neutral, extension, flexion, radial deviations, and ulnar deviation). Wrists were positioned dynamically and then held statically in a custom fixture through forces applied to the 4 wrist flexor/extensor tendon groups. Three-dimensional computer models of the radius, lunate, and capitate were generated from the computed tomographic images, and the kinematics of the capitate and lunate were calculated relative to the neutral position. For the intact wrist, the motion of the capitate was calculated relative to both the lunate (midcarpal motion) and the radius (overall wrist motion) and the motion of the lunate was calculated relative to the radius (radiocarpal motion). After PRC, only the movement of the capitate relative to the radius was calculated, which represents radiocapitate and overall wrist motion. All motions were plotted in 3 dimensions for purposes of qualitative visualization. RESULTS: After PRC, the capitate articulated with the lunate fossa of the radius for all positions in all samples. Overall wrist motion decreased 28%, 30%, 40%, and 12% in flexion, extension, radial deviation, and ulnar deviation, respectively. Motion at the radiocarpal joint after PRC, however, was greater compared with motion at the radiocarpal and midcarpal joints of the intact wrist during flexion and extension. This was not the case in radial deviation because of impingement of the trapezoid on the radial styloid. In radial and ulnar deviation, motion of the capitate head changed from predominantly rotational in the intact wrist (midcarpal joint) to a combination of rotation and translation after PRC (radiocarpal joint). CONCLUSIONS: Removal of the proximal carpal row decreased normal wrist flexion and extension. Although ulnar deviation was preserved, radial deviation was limited by impingement of the trapezoid on the radial styloid. Radiocapitate range of motion after PRC was greater than capitolunate range of motion in the intact wrists. Compared with previously published requirements, wrist range of motion observed after PRC was sufficient for activities of daily living.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]