These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: A comparison of intubating conditions in children following induction of anaesthesia with propofol and suxamethonium or propofol and remifentanil.
    Author: Morgan JM, Barker I, Peacock JE, Eissa A.
    Journal: Anaesthesia; 2007 Feb; 62(2):135-9. PubMed ID: 17223805.
    Abstract:
    Sixty ASA 1 and 2 children aged between 2 and 16 years who required tracheal intubation as part of anaesthesia for elective surgery were studied. We evaluated intubating conditions, haemodynamic responses and duration of apnoea following propofol 4 mg.kg-1 combined with either remifentanil 1.25 microg.kg-1 (group R), or suxamethonium 1 mg.kg-1 (group S). Tracheal intubation was graded as excellent, good or poor according to ease of laryngoscopy, vocal cord position, coughing, and jaw relaxation and limb movement. Thirty of group S and 28 of group R children were successfully intubated on the first attempt. Overall, intubation conditions were excellent or good in 26/30 (87%) patients in group S and 20/30 (67%) in group R (p<0.05). Mean apnoea time was 190 s in group S, and 362 s in group R (p<0.001). Heart rate increased in response to suxamethonium (p<0.01) and both systolic and diastolic blood pressure decreased in the remifentanil group (p<0.01).
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]